Another element of style is the writer's treatment of each link in the chain of fact, value, emotion, and action. Rational readers can learn a fact in the text they are reading. When they connect that fact to a value they hold, they will automatically experience an emotion. If the value is a high one, and the circumstances are appropriate, readers will take action. For example, if a writer says, "Smith Company has published my new book, Preventing Dental Problems," then those readers who respect the writer's knowledge and are concerned about their dental health will feel hopeful about their future dental health and either investigate the book further or take direct action to purchase it. The writer has stated a fact, perhaps including expected benefits of knowing that fact; readers connect that fact to their own values, experience an emotion, and take action.
EXAMPLES. Consider two cases, one at each end of a style spectrum. The first is an announcement published in the "Objectivist Calendar" column of The Objectivist Newsletter, Vol. 1, No. 1 (January, 1962), p. 4. It says:
The next New York series of "Basic Principles of Objectivism" will be given at the Hotel Roosevelt, 45 St. & Madison Ave., at 7:30 P.M., on twenty consecutive Tuesday evenings, beginning February 13. Registration is now open.
This first case presents facts, and it relies on rational readers to recognize the value. (In a longer announcement, and in a different, more general publication, a rational writer might have identified the benefits of attending, but would still let readers make the evaluation and the decision to act.)
The second case is a composite of insulting announcements I have seen recently:
Gladys Grumbly, the most awesome speaker of the day, will be talking about introspection at the Wilshire Community Center on February 12 at 8 pm. You will love her presentation! You owe it to yourself to go! Sign up now! Don't delay and don't miss this absolutely fantastic opportunity!!! Click on the name below and be certain to Like this page now!!!
The writer of the second case will eventually lose rational
readers—those who want to evaluate, feel, and take action at their own
initiative and in the context of their own personal values. The readers who accept
such abuse and remain the writer's followers will tend to be automatons.
The writer may then wonder why he has such a seemingly passive and unintelligent
audience.
Over the long-term, the writer creates his audience through a process similar to natural selection: Assume readers are irrational, write accordingly, and the rational ones will go away; or assume readers are rational, write accordingly, and they will continue to pay attention to one's writings as the years go by.
Burgess Laughlin
Author of The Power and the Glory: The Key Ideas and Crusading
Lives of Eight Debaters of Reason vs. Faith, here
2 comments:
Thank you for the comment (and confirmation).
However, the comment seems misplaced. Should it not be a comment on the June 4, 2013 post ("Is Reading the News ...")?
Also, please remember to use your name when commenting. Sadly I must delete the comment if no name is supplied here.
Post a Comment